Fencing.Net

Using Non-Combativity as a Tactic

In the 2012 Milwaukee Division I Men’s Epee NAC, Benjamin Wieder was facing Jimmy Moody in the round of 32. Moody secured a 4-5 touch lead at the end of period one. Entering period 2, Moody proceeded to withdraw his blade from reach, fully understanding that Wieder’s forte was in his blade work. Wieder desperately searched for the blade for 15 seconds to no avail. The referee called “Halt!” and progressed the bout to the third period. Using control of the clock and continuing to keep his blade out of reach, Moody responded with counter flicks as Wieder searched, and proceeded to win the bout 15-9.

While some people will scratch their head or throw their arms up and curse the FIE for passing this rule, the point is, non-combativity is here to stay, so you might as well use it to your advantage.

There are various ways to incorporate this rule into your bouts for your tactical advantage, as I’ve displayed in the flow chart below:

Lehfeldt Theory of Non-Combativity

Confused? Allow me to explain:

This is not a one size fits all kind of tactic. I have seen it used successfully at the national level and choose to employ it into most of my bouts and have had great success doing so. We can continue debating whether or not non-combativity is good for epee, or we can make every effort to use the rule to our advantage in bouts, and do what we try to best on the strip: win.

Damien is a competitive fencer and coach at DC Fencers Club in Silver Spring, Maryland. Damien was the coach of a London 2012 Olympic Athlete in Modern Pentathlon (Suzanne Stettinius). He is an A-rated epeeist and foilist and was a member of the 2012 North American Cup Gold Medal Men’s Epee Team.

Exit mobile version